Stabbing hearing delayed a week for Springdale man
By Chuck Biedka
Published: Tuesday, April 3, 2012
CHESWICK -- A hearing was postponed Monday for a Springdale man accused of stabbing his boss because the arresting police officer and the alleged victim didn't show up for district court.
Eric Jeffrey Lindeman, 28, of 922 Logan St., is accused of using a box cutter to slash Lee Liebel, 33, his boss and roommate at the time, a little more than a week ago.
Springdale Patrolman Jeremy Liotta charged Lindeman with aggravated and simple assault, theft, reckless endangering, harassment, disorderly conduct and public drunkenness.
Lindeman has been in the Allegheny County Jail since March 23 in lieu of $200,000 cash bond.
On Monday, Lindeman's attorney, Mike DeRiso, asked Cheswick-area District Judge David Sosovicka to dismiss all charges.
"The prosecution can't produce the witness or the officer," DeRiso said. "I ask that the charges be dismissed."
When asked about their whereabouts by the district judge, Springdale police Chief Joe Naviglia told Sosovicka that the victim knew about the hearing and so did his officer, Liotta.
Naviglia said Liotta is serving a suspension.
Sosovicka rejected DeRiso's request to have the charges dismissed.
Instead, he gave the assistant district attorney one week to have the witness and officer in the courtroom.
DeRiso next argued that $200,000 is far too high of a bond in this case and claimed that Lindeman also is a victim.
Assistant District Attorney Kevin Alan Chernosky asked Sosovicka not to reduce bond, but if he did, that it be cut to no lower than $125,000.
"Lindeman is a flight risk and only moved to this state about six months ago," Chernosky argued.
When Sosovicka asked Lindeman if he has ever been arrested, the suspect replied, "Yes. Once in Minnesota a long time ago. Assault in 2004. I served about 20 days."
Minnesota court records show he was sentenced to serve 30 days and was given credit for time served. He was charged in other cases and police are checking to see if there are active warrants for Lindeman.
Lindeman told Sosovicka that said he moved to Springdale to work for Liebel.
Lindeman and Liebel lived in Minnesota and "he asked him to come work for him here," Lindeman said told the district judge.
In the end, Sosovicka reduced Lindeman bond to $75,000 cash and ordered him to stay away from Liebel if Lindeman somehow posts bond before his preliminary hearing, which is rescheduled to Monday morning.
Mum on suspension
After the proceeding, Naviglia refused to say why Liotta is on suspension.
Contacted later Monday, Liotta said he hadn't been served with an affidavit for Monday's hearing. He also said he is in the process of resigning from the force. He wouldn't talk about the suspension.
Mayor Eileen Miller said she is aware of the suspension.
"Unfortunately, I'm not permitted to comment on a personnel matter," she said.
Councilman Jason Fry, who handles personnel issues, said the mayor and council, its labor attorney and the union representative are scheduled to meet April 17 to discuss the matter.
Outside of the courtroom, DeRiso said there is a question about what happened early March 22.
"It's still being investigated. I don't know what's going on with Springdale police. That's not my business," DeRiso said. "But it's clear that my client has defensive wounds."
Lindeman was hospitalized after his arrest for wounds to his hands.
Police allege that Lindeman was drunk when he argued with Liebel about money, and Lindeman then grabbed a box cutter.
Liebel had a deep cut to the side of his face and stab wounds in his chest and abdomen.
By Monday afternoon, constables were given a subpoena to serve on Liotta, Naviglia said, while the chief was going to serve a subpoena on Liebel.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.