Share This Page

Fire company likely to lose aerial truck

It appears after Monday's council meeting that Kittanning's Hose Company 1 will lose its aerial ladder truck after all.

Last month, Gerald Shuster, president of Hose Company 1, had asked that council give the fire company until April 15 to secure a $453,000 loan to buy the Smeal 105 Aerial Ladder truck from the borough. Council agreed but also opened its purchase to bidders.

Last night, Shuster told council that after members of the fire company consulted with legal and financial advisors, they determined it was not fiscally sound "to legally bind the company for nearly a half million dollars for the next 20 years."

The fire company regretfully withdraws its offer," said Shuster.

He also said the fire company would not take any legal action to prevent the sale, but stipulated that council allow adequate time for the removal of all company-owned equipment from the truck

Shuster also presented council with one last option:

He proposed the fire company assume the $124,000 balance of the PA Emergency Management Agency (PEMA) loan and give the borough $100,000 in cash, which he argued would reduce the borough's debt by 50 percent. It would also allow borough council to request a re-negotiation for the loan for better terms while keeping the truck in the community.

He concluded by saying that the borough has already paid nearly $300,000 since purchasing the 2008 truck and will have spent that amount for an asset it will no longer have.

Council voted 5-2 to reject the proposal. Council members voting against the offer were Joie Pryde, Kim Fox, Richard Reedy, Andrew Peters and Chris Schiano. voting to accept it were Ange Turco and Lisa McCanna. Mike Rosenberger abstained.

After opening and reviewing all bids for the sale of the truck -- one from a vendor in Connecticut for $300,000 and one from a vendor in Alabama for $401,600 -- council voted 8-0 to reject the bids and to readvertize the sale of the truck, setting a minimum of $450,000.

Gene Stephens, the company's fire chief, made a last pitch for council to reconsider the option which Shuster presented.

Council President Chris Schiano said: " We need to become solvent and get out from under the loan."

Councilwoman Kim Fox agreed:

"I don't want to see the truck go," she told Stephens. "It breaks my heart. But we are worse than any municipality. We are in such bad shape, we have to get back on track. It's a financial struggle for you to keep it, it's a financial struggle for us to keep it."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.