Concern over endangered bat expedites gas driller's tree cutting plans
A hibernating endangered bat is helping a gas drilling company chop down trees on private land in Beaver County, thanks to a judge's ruling.
The trees, being cut today according to an attorney in the case, are on private land in Darlington that is the subject of federal and county court cases over drilling rights that Chesapeake Energy Corp. acquired in 2005, according to court filings.
The company and landowners have been locked in a legal battle, with the landowners claiming in county court that they were deceived into signing the leases Chesapeake now holds. Those landowners denied the company access to start work, leading Oklahoma-based Chesapeake to file for federal court protections. They both filed court complaints Tuesday.
U.S. District Judge David Cercone today placed a restraining order on the landowners trying to block company workers, saying Chesapeake would be irreparably harmed without access to the land. But the judge said tree clearing has to be done by Saturday or wait until Nov. 1 to avoid disturbing the habitat of the Indiana bat while it is out of hibernation.
The company, through its subsidiary Chesapeake Appalachia, had argued it needed to start clearing trees by Wednesday in order to finish before the federal deadline Saturday. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service prohibits timbering in the area for six months through November because to protect the species' hibernation habitat.
Despite the shortened timetable, the company started timbering today when it received the federal court order, said Steven C. Townsend, lawyer for the landowners.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.