Prospect watch: Montour's Devin Wilson
By Kevin Gorman
Published: Sunday, March 25, 2012,
Devin Wilson has a dilemma most WPIAL athletes would envy, having received Division I scholarship offers in two sports. While Wilson is thrilled to have multiple options, he has a difficult choice ahead of him.
"I haven't decided yet," Wilson said. "When I'm in that sport, whether it's football or basketball, I put all my time in that sport. In the summer, I train for both. I haven't picked one, but after basketball season I hope to pick one and buckle down and try to become my best at it.
"I'll never stop playing either sport in high school, that's for sure."
North Carolina State has offered the Montour junior a chance to play wide receiver in football, where he had a WPIAL-leading 72 receptions for 901 yards and 12 touchdowns for the WPIAL Class AAA champions.
"It's going to come down to what they want in a receiver," Montour coach Lou Cerro said. "If they want somebody who runs good routes, catches everything across the middle and can out-jump anybody, he's your guy."
Akron, Duquesne and James Madison want Wilson as a point guard in basketball, where he led Montour to a WPIAL title and PIAA runner-up finish last year and to the PIAA runner-up spot this spring.
Wilson attended Penn State's junior day for football prospects, but is focusing his attention on the hardwood for now. He admits that he goes back and forth every season on which sport is his favorite.
"That does happen sometimes," Wilson said. "If I'm playing real good during basketball season, I'm like, 'Basketball is great.' Same thing during football season: If I have a good practice or a good game, I'll be like, 'I want to play football.' My mind does change. I'm hoping to buckle down, see the pros and cons, and pick the sport where I can be my best."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.