ShareThis Page

Fayette commissioners hire attorney

Mary Pickels
| Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Citing Fayette County's need to take a "litigation-avoidance posture," Al Ambrosini, chairman of the board of commissioners, on Tuesday proposed the hiring of a Greensburg attorney to be the county's interim chief solicitor.

He and Commissioner Vincent Zapotosky voted in favor of hiring Ken Burkley for a period of three to six months, beginning on April 1 at a salary not to exceed $4,000 a month.

In February, the board accepted the resignation of longtime county solicitor Joseph Ferens. Attorneys John Cupp and Sheryl Heid continue to be county attorneys.

Commissioner Angela Zimmerlink voted against the measure.

"I never met Ken Burkley. I have no idea who he is," she said.

Zimmerlink asked if there had been a meeting to determine his scope of work.

She questioned the last-minute addition of Ambrosini's proposal to yesterday's agenda.

"We had an agenda meeting last week to avoid these kind of (communication) problems," Zimmerlink said.

Ambrosini said he and Zapotosky met with a county insurance representative in an effort to try to reduce the county's deductible and discuss ways to reduce litigation.

"We've had such a horrendous problem with lawsuits in Fayette County the last few years. We absolutely have to address that," he said.

"A lot of these lawsuits come from various boards in the county," he said.

Those boards' solicitors "operate autonomously," he said.

Burkley can offer an "impartial" assist with "the redesign process" of the county's solicitors, Ambrosini said.

"We need to establish what our new organization is going to look like in terms of our solicitors' group," he said.

"The outcome will be of benefit to the county if we are able to cut back on the number of claims against the county. It's something we should try," Zapotosky said.

In another 2-1 vote, the board renewed a three-year contract with Greensburg firm Felice Associates to provide human resources services.

Zimmerlink voted against Ambrosini's motion, another late addition to yesterday's agenda.

Several residents questioned if having an in-house personnel department might not be a cheaper option.

"My comment would be to review in-house (costs) versus contracting out," Zimmerlink said.

Ambrosini said the contract cost remains the same, $122,400 per year.

It includes on-site human resources director Dominick Carnicella, as well as handling of the county's four unions' periodic contract negotiations and grievance issues.

Salary demands for a single personnel director can rise above $100,000, Zapotosky said, excluding potential outside assistance from labor lawyers.

He added that Greene County, with a smaller population than Fayette's, has human resources costs of $197,000.

In other business, the board tabled agenda items to hire a chief county clerk and director of public works.

The two positions are to be filled because county manager Warren Hughes has retired.

Candidates are still being evaluated for the positions, the board said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.