Man dies in Bullskin Township crash
A Connellsville man died while behind the wheel of his pickup truck yesterday in Bullskin Township.
Fayette County Coroner Dr. Phillip Reilly said that Norman E. Schurg, 65, of Connellsville was pronounced dead at the Highlands Hospital emergency room.
The vehicle's passenger, Kathleen R. Schurg, 63, of Connellsville was transported to UPMC Presby in Pittsburgh for injuries sustained in the crash.
State police at Uniontown said that Norman Schurg was driving the Chevrolet S-10 north on Route 119 when it drove off the east edge of the road. The truck traveled through a yard at 2115 Buttermore Blvd. and then struck several bushes before going down an embankment, coming to rest in a creek at 2:05 p.m.
Reilly said he believes Norman Schurg suffered a cardiac event while driving the vehicle. Reilly said he saw no trauma-related injuries that could cause a fatality. The driver was wearing a seat belt and Kathleen Schurg said to the first responders that he was slumped over the wheel.
Because of that information as well as his age, Reilly said there will not be an autopsy performed. A standard toxicology test is being conducted, but Reilly said he doesn't believe alcohol or drugs were a factor in the collision.
Traffic on Route 119 near Marion Motors was slowed for several hours on Thursday as state police investigated the collision.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.