Alleged culprits in Murrysville silver heist arrested
Someone broke into a Murrysville electrotechnics company last spring and stole 429 pounds of silver pellets worth $306,000, then buried them in a field near Irwin in three one-gallon plastic jugs, police said.
When the thieves forgot where they buried the loot, they rented a metal detector, located and dug up the jugs, and sold the silver to Southside Jewelers in Pittsburgh for thousands of dollars, police said.
A nearly 11-month investigation into the theft culminated on Wednesday with the arrest of four Allegheny County men in connection with the theft from Metalor Technologies.
Arraigned yesterday on charges of conspiracy and receiving stolen property were: Colin Carr Fulciniti, 22, of Shadyside; Brian John Flaherty, 55, of Penn Hills; his son, Bryon Jon Flaherty, 38, of Penn Hills; and George M. Viglione, 56, of Monroeville.
Arrest warrants have been issued for two Irwin residents -- Bobbie Jean Dickson, 47, and William Michael Degrange, 55 -- on burglary and theft charges in connection with the April 2011 heist.
The current price per ounce of silver is $32.16. When the silver was taken, the price was 47.15 per ounce.
In court documents, Murrysville police Officer John Devlin and Westmoreland County Detective Thomas Horan said someone entered the Metalor building through a second-floor vent. Inside, investigators found bolt cutters and several pillowcases, one of which contained silver granules.
The thieves used a long tree branch to place a white T-shirt over a security camera near the vent, authorities said.
Bryon Flaherty and Fulciniti were released yesterday on $10,000 unsecured bond. Brian Flaherty and Viglione were released on $25,000 unsecured bond.
Preliminary hearings for the four men are scheduled for April 3.
Jake Shireman, Metalor Technologies customer service manager, said none of the suspects is employed by the company.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.