ShareThis Page

Foxes return nine seniors to tennis court

| Thursday, March 15, 2012

Last season, the Fox Chapel boys tennis team finished second in Section 3-AAA and made it to the quarterfinals of the WPIAL tournament.

Coach Dave Prevost has a lot of experience returning after losing only one starter to graduation -- Shankar Rajupet -- which could bode well for the Foxes, who often are in postseason play.

"I think it will be an interesting year," Prevost said. "Call it a rebuilding year. We have a lot of players with experience, but we've also got a lot of young players who will need to contribute."

The Foxes return nine players with starting experience -- seniors Ishan Chatterjee, Ian Cullen and Rohan Meringenti; juniors Ben Short, Karthik Narayanan, Patrick Campbell and Taha Lel-Majbri; and sophomores Dylan McCullough and Josh Lehman.

Cullen played on the team as a sophomore, but was on the track team last year.

"He's been playing really well," Prevost said. "He's a nice addition to the team."

Prevost has plans to move soon a couple of junior varsity players to varsity.

"They'll probably be freshmen (that move up), so that bodes well for the future," the coach said. "Our lineup isn't completely set, yet, but we'll be strong in the middle.

"There's virtually no difference between our No. 3 singles player and our top doubles team. I'll be doing a lot of shifting from match to match.

Prevost said Short and McCullough will be competing for the No. 1 singles slot, but it will be the team's depth and balance throughout the lineup that will determine how far they go this season.

"I'll have more versatility on the team than I've had in the past," he said. "That's nice to have."

While Short and McCullough anchor the top two singles slots, Lehman or McCullough will see time at No. 3. Narayanan, Chatterjee and Cullen will see time at No. 1 doubles, with others filling in at second doubles.

Prevost said Shady Side Academy again should be the team to beat in section play.

"They look to be really strong again. I would have to say that they're the section favorite," he said. "Woodland Hills and Central Catholic were surprisingly tough last year, and they'll be giving us a battle. We're going to have to be on our toes against them. They could wind up being 3-2 matches.

"With our talent, I believe we'll be strong contenders to make the playoffs, but we can't afford to let up against any team in the section, including Gateway and Plum."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.