ShareThis Page

Monroeville remains those of missing Butler man

| Tuesday, March 13, 2012

A Butler man told his sister he was going to live in the wilderness before disappearing 10 years ago, Allegheny County police said Monday after the man's remains were identified.

The Allegheny County Medical Examiner's Office said the bones found near a Duquesne Light Co. substation power plant in Monroeville on Friday are the remains of Anthony Pataky, who was 53 when he was reported missing in 2002.

Pataky's family has been notified of the discovery, said Tom Rabickow, a forensics supervisor in the Allegheny County Medical Examiner's Office. Family members didn't return calls for comment.

Turtle Creek Mayor Adam Forgie was involved in the search for Pataky when he was a firefighter for the Turtle Creek Volunteer Fire Department.

"I hope (the discovery) brings closure for the family," he said.

Pataky, a resident of Meadows Manor Personal Care Home in Butler, was a Vietnam veteran with psychological problems that included frequent flashbacks, county police Sgt. Scott Scherer said. The owner of Meadows couldn't be reached for comment.

Pataky had been visiting his sister in Turtle Creek when he was reported missing July 7, 2002, Scherer said.

He was last seen wearing a white T-shirt and black pants with a hole in one of the legs. He had only been missing a few hours when his sister called police, but she was concerned because of his psychological problems, Scherer said.

A police search began a few days later, Turtle Creek police Chief Dale Kraeer said. It was unclear why it took that long to begin a search.

Turtle Creek police worked with canines and the state police, who conducted an air search, to try to locate Pataky, Kraeer said. Authorities checked an area close to where Pataky was eventually found, but the area's steep terrain made the search more difficult, he said.

"Unless the dog had a hit, they would never have (taken) a dog down there," he said.

An autopsy is scheduled for today, Rabickow said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.