Belle Vernon man accused of sexually assaulting girl, 7
A Belle Vernon man is facing charges he allegedly sexually assaulted a 7-year-old girl in 2010 at his home.
David Ray Sepesky, 33, of 433 Bluff St., faces one count each of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse with a child, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, indecent assault, statutory sexual assault, and sexual assault.
According to the affidavit of probable cause, the incident allegedly occurred on July 21, 2010.
The child was spending the night in the home.
During the night, Sepesky allegedly fondled the child and forced her to perform oral sex on him, according to the affidavit of probable cause.
The mother reported the alleged incident to the Washington County Children and Youth Services, because they were living in Wash-ington County at the time.
The case was even-tually turned over to Southwest Regional Police because the alleged incident occurred in Belle Vernon.
Southwest Regional Police Chief John Hartman said his department had been working on the case for 18 months prior to filing the charges Feb. 27.
The charges were filed after consulting with Fayette County District Attorney Jack Heneks, who approved the charges.
DNA analysis is being conducted on the child's clothing at the state police barracks in Greensburg, police said.
A preliminary hearing is scheduled for 9:45 a.m. April 13 before Magisterial District Judge Jesse Cramer, in Belle Vernon.
He was released after posting $50,000 bond.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.