Jeannette boys cruise in opener
CLARION -- Showing no ill effects after a 14-day layoff, the Jeannette boys basketball team forced seven turnovers in the first quarter of their PIAA Class AA opener Saturday.
The strong defensive effort paid off as Jeannette rolled to a 73-43 victory over Smethport in a first-round game at Clarion University.
The Jayhawks scored five baskets off the early turnovers to fuel a 13-0 run and take control of a game in which they never trailed. Jeannette (17-8) will play rival Greensburg Central Catholic in the second round Wednesday.
Smethport, in the PIAA tournament for only the second time in the past 23 seasons, finished 18-6.
"That was a great start," Jeannette coach Adrian Batts said. "Especially with us being off 14 days, I was worried about us fouling. That was a big step for us to stay out of foul trouble in the first quarter."
Demetrious Cox scored eight of his team-high 14 points in the first quarter. Jeannette took a 20-7 lead after Smethport tied it at 7 on a 3-pointer by Kevin Lord.
"Give Jeanette all the credit for pressuring us and getting our guards out of the game," Smethport coach Dan Zeigler said.
Six more Hubbers turnovers in the second quarter led to a 33-24 advantage for the Jayhawks at halftime. The turnover bug continued to bite the Hubbers in the third quarter; they committed miscues on nine of 11 possessions at one point.
"I don't know what it was," Zeigler said. "Jeannette just seemed to make us uncomfortable."
Batts substituted liberally in the second half, and all 11 Jayhawks in uniform reached the scoring column. Duke Brown came off the bench to score 11 points, and Orlando Morgan added 10.
"Some of those guys don't get to play much," Batts said. "It was good to see all of them get in to play."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.