ShareThis Page

Pittsburgh hospitals endured violent episodes in past

Tom Fontaine
| Friday, March 9, 2012

John Flajnik has firsthand experience in dealing with hospital violence.

A gunman fatally shot a hospital caseworker and then held Flajnik and his wife and daughter hostage inside the former St. Francis Health Center in Lawrenceville for about 90 minutes one night in February 1988.

"It seems like such a long, long time ago," said Flajnik, 73, of Plum. "Every once in a while someone will mention it, but other than that I don't think about it much."

Edith Anderson, then 31, was convicted of third-degree murder while mentally ill in the shooting death of hospital caseworker Linda Rosen, 27, of Squirrel Hill. Anderson barricaded herself in a bathroom in the psychiatric emergency room after the shooting, with the door ajar and a weapon drawn on Flajnik, his wife, Bernadette, and daughter Linda.

Anderson was sentenced to 23 1/2 to 47 years behind bars. She remains in prison.

"I feel so lucky that none of my family got hurt," Flajnik said.

Some other local hospital shooting incidents:

-- Off-duty Pittsburgh police Officer Joseph Benz shot Paaron Jones, 22, in the head during a June 1981 altercation at West Penn Hospital in Bloomfield. Jones of Bloomfield remained hospitalized for four years before dying of pneumonia shortly after being released. Benz was cleared of charges of voluntary and involuntary manslaughter.

-- In June 1989, Daniel Hannan, then 30, of East Liberty shot a St. Francis Medical Center billing clerk in the leg and then surrendered. Police said he was upset about a hospital bill. He later pleaded guilty to aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, making terroristic threats and other charges and was sentenced to up to 20 years of probation, court records show.

Photo Galleries

Shooting at Western Psych

Shooting at Western Psych

Shooting at Western Psych

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.