ShareThis Page

Tuesday takes

| Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Expensive cleanup: A half-billion dollars is, as they say, "real money." And, if that's really what it might cost to clean up the Park Township nuclear waste dump, the Army Corps of Engineers ought to listen to what Tom Haley has to say. He's the former nuclear engineer who, until his contract was canceled, was researching just what might be in those trenches the corps plans to dig up. It seems only common sense to renew his effort so the job can be done safely.

Port Authority funding: The Allegheny Institute's Jake Haulk has a worthy idea to save Allegheny County's mass-transit agency. He says the state should offer it $30 million in funding this year — but only in return for a legislative bill that ends the transit union's right to strike. If there are no takers, then nobody's really serious about saving local bus and trolley service.

The yuck factor: Everybody thinks it but Trib medical columnist Luis Fábregas wrote about it on Saturday — the possibility of germs and dirt and all manner of yuck being transported in and out of hospitals by employees wearing those ubiquitous scrubs to and from work and outside during smoke and lunch breaks. If hospitals truly are sincere about better infection control, they'll stop the practice.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.