2 arrested for gun charges in Monessen
By Valley Independent
Published: Saturday, March 3, 2012
MONESSEN — City police arrested two Monessen men along Braddock Avenue Thursday after responding to a call of shots fired in the 600 block of Knox Avenue.
Michael Standard, 20, no address available, and Jashawn Mackall, 18, of 642 Braddock Ave., were both arrested for allegedly being in possession of guns.
Standard, who allegedly had one gun, was charged with poss-ession of a firearm by a proh-ibited person, firearms not to be carried without a license and reck-lessly end-angering another person, police said.
Mackall, who police said had two guns, was charged with receiving stolen property, firearms not to be carried without a license and recklessly end-angering another person.
One of the guns Mackall allegedly had was reported stolen, police said.
Both were arraig-ned by Magisterial District Judge Frank Pallone, of New Kensington.
Standard, who was wanted on a warrant from another case, was held on $25,000 straight cash bond. Bail was denied on the new charges, police Chief Mark Gibson said.
Pallone also denied bail for Mackall.
Both were transported to Westmoreland County Prison by sheriff's deputies.
They are both scheduled for preliminary hearings at 10 a.m. March 9 before Magisterial District Judge Joseph Dalfonso, in Monessen.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.