Forward Township supervisors have given developers of a proposed GetGo gas station the green light to pursue a license to sell liquor.
Supervisors met briefly Tuesday morning to vote on the matter.
The township's three supervisors approved the measure unanimously.
Representatives of GetGo and its parent company went before the supervisors earlier in February to seek necessary permission to bring a liquor license into the municipality from outside the community.
Supervisors delayed voting on the matter at the earlier meeting, opting instead to reconvene the meeting this week.
Board of supervisors chairman Tom DeRosa said the board delayed its vote to give the public time offer its input.
"We wanted to give everybody a chance to express the pros and cons. Nobody came forward with any cons," he said, adding, "It's going to be a $4 million building with a with a big tax base. It's hard to turn that down in this economy."
Provided the chain is able to obtain the liquor license, GetGo representatives say the proposed 5,700-square-foot store will sell beer and wine coolers from a separate register in a restaurant portion of the facility.
Planners say they expect 99 percent of their sales to be carryout six-packs, 12-packs and singles, though customers will have the option of consuming up to two drinks in the restaurant area of the shop with food.
An attorney for GetGo acknowledged at the earlier meeting that failure to obtain a liquor license could jeopardize the project.
The proposed convenience store and gas station is to be built at the intersection of Weigles Hill Road and Route 51.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.