Trafford man pleads guilty to giving money to fugitive
By Richard Gazarik
Published: Thursday, Feb. 23, 2012,
A business partner of a Westmoreland County fugitive pleaded guilty on Wednesday in federal court in Pittsburgh to illegally withdrawing money from bank accounts and giving it to the wanted man.
Sean Kerrigan, 30, of Trafford was charged with structuring bank transactions to avoid mandatory reporting requirements, according to an indictment.
He pleaded guilty to one count before Judge Nora Barry Fischer. He will be sentenced June 29.
Banks are required to file a Currency Transaction Report, or CTR, whenever $10,000 or more is deposited, withdrawn or transferred from one account to another. The goal of making withdrawals under $10,000 is to avoid filing a report that would alert the U.S. Treasury to potential criminal acts, according to the Internal Revenue Service.
Kerrigan admitted he withdrew $108,000 between January and March 2008 in amounts under $10,000 and gave the cash to Frank Guzik Jr. of Derry, who was indicted in 2010 of bilking investors out of $7.5 million.
According to the indictment, Kerrigan made 13 withdrawals of amounts ranging from $7,100 to $9,500.
Guzik, whose last known address was in Murrysville, disappeared in 2008. He was re-indicted Feb. 15 along with a business partner, Bonnie Gardner, 54, of Murrysville, on charges of mail and wire fraud and conspiracy, according to the new indictment.
Kerrigan was involved in business dealings with Guzik, who operated East Haven Investments in Monroeville. Both men bought, renovated and then resold homes in Allegheny and Westmoreland counties.
Kerrigan told authorities that he was the last person to see Guzik before he left on a flight from Pittsburgh International Airport. The last known sighting of Guzik was in March 2008, according to the IRS, which said he withdrew $249,000 from an account and purchased $200,000 in untraceable gold coins from a dealer in Silsbee, Texas.
The new indictments of Guzik and Gardner alleged that they enticed investors into loaning them money, promising them earnings between 8 percent and 14 percent. Their investments would be secured by mortgages.
The two are accused of obtaining multiple mortgages on the same property. The amount of the mortgages was much higher than the actual value of the buildings, the indictment states.
Guzik and Gardner allegedly duped the investors by selling the renovated houses to straw parties to make it appear that East Haven was prospering.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.