52 turnovers let Elizabeth Forward girls escape
By Mark Kaboly
Published: Thursday, Feb. 23, 2012
Sam Kosanovich has one simple rule: If you are open, shoot the ball because eventually it will go in.
But what happens when it doesn't?
That's easy ... just force 52 turnovers with your unrelenting defense.
Elizabeth Forward brushed aside 57 missed shots, turned up the defensive pressure to the max and earned its first playoff win since 2001 with a laborious 34-31 overtime victory over Hampton at North Hills.
EF had lost nine consecutive first-round playoff games.
The Lady Warriors advanced to Saturday's quarterfinal against top-seeded Hopewell, a 60-24 winner over Belle Vernon.
"I can't begin to tell you how fortunate I feel about this game," Kosanovich said.
Shooting 12-of-69 from the floor, including 0-of-20 from 3-point range, permits you to feel fortunate to win.
"Yes, we had a bad shooting night, I understand," Kosanovich said. "When the ball is not falling -- and it surely wasn't falling -- we have to do something. We believe that defense wins games. We had to believe in that tonight. If we gave up on defense, we would've lost this game."
Elizabeth Forward (18-4) forced Hampton (12-10) to turn the ball over 10 times in the first and seconds quarters; 11 in the third; 13 in the fourth; and eight times in the decisive four-minute overtime period.
"They just kept coming at us, coming at us and they never said die," Hampton coach Mary Bukovac said. "Even if you think you are in the free, they are coming at you by sending another kid at you. They created a lot of those turnovers."
Elizabeth Forward got just enough offense to pull out the win. Some was from the expected (14 from Dana Buck) while the other offensive outburst wasn't -- 14 from Alison Pastore.
Pastore took over late in the game as she scored 13 of her 14 points in the fourth quarter and overtime including all five of the Lady Warriors' points in the extra period.
"I don't know if we expected it or not from her, but we know what she is able to do so that is why we put the ball in her hands in the end," Kosanovich said. "We wanted the ball in Ali's hands. She gives us the best shot of to drive or kick it out. She did a splendid job."
Pastore shot well from the floor hitting 3-of-8 shots, but created the most problems for Hampton by driving the lane. She went to the foul line 11 times in the fourth quarter and overtime and made eight.
"It was very frustrating, but we always say if you can play good defense then it doesn't matter if your shots aren't falling," Pastore said. "That's what kept us in this game."
EF missed its first six shots of the game to set the tone as they trailed by as many as seven by halftime and nine early in the second half.
EF whittled away at its deficit with some inside play from Buck, and got to within 29-26 with less than a minute to go.
The sophomore guard drove the lane, made the basket and was fouled to tie the game at 29-29 that eventual would send it into overtime.
It was a controversial call by the officials.
"I thought maybe they should've called that on the floor," Bukovac said.
Pastore didn't disagree totally.
"I was shooting that," Pastore said with a laugh.
In overtime, Pastore's layup 90 seconds in gave EF a 31-29 lead. The defense took over after that, creating five turnovers over the final two minutes.
"It was our effort defensively," Kosanovich said. "It was our pressing and trapping and never giving up is what causes that. It wasn't pretty, but whatever you have to do to win, you do."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.