Former Apollo resident charged in rash of 2010 burglaries
By Jodi Weigand
Published: Tuesday, Feb. 21, 2012
Apollo Police said they connected a man with a history of theft to a series of daytime burglaries committed in the borough in 2010.
Adam J. Bubash, 33, of Boswell, Somerset County and formerly of Apollo, faces multiple charges, including burglary, criminal trespass and theft, jail records show. He is being held in the Armstrong County Jail on $25,000 bond. A preliminary hearing is set for Wednesday
Apollo Police officer Ralph Varrato said fingerprints and DNA connected Bubash to the rash of break-ins.
Police believe Bubash committed about 10 burglaries in the area before he was jailed in October 2010 for trying to break into a home in Harrison.
In July 2010, Apollo Police reported that someone had broken into seven homes in the northern portion of the borough since the beginning of the year.
Varrato said the thief usually took jewelry and coins. In one case, the burglar stole porcelain dolls, police said.
Some of the items later showed up in Pittsburgh pawn shops.
Police say Bubash pleaded guilty in the Harrison break-in. Most recently, he pleaded guilty in January 2011 for a theft in Arnold.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.