ShareThis Page

Five hurt in Route 88 crash

| Tuesday, Feb. 21, 2012

UNION TOWNSHIP — Five people were injured in a head-on collision Monday afternoon on Route 88 near Mingo Junction Road after one of the drivers said he blacked out.

According to police, a silver mini van driven by Edward Caton, 35, of Monongahela, collided with a green 2000 Dodge Neon driven by Ruby Todd, 64, also of Monongahela.

Both drivers, as well as three children in the van, were injured.

A third vehicle, a Chevrolet Yukon driven by Jennifer Macky, 48, of Yukon, drove off the road to avoid hitting the vehicles that collided.

A 15-year old juvenile who was in the passenger seat of Caton's van was flown by emergency helicopter to Children's Hospital in Pittsburgh with an apparent leg injury.

Todd was flown to UPMC Presbyterian Hospital in Pittsburgh with apparent chest injuries.

Two juveniles, ages 8 and 14, also passengers in Caton's vehicle, were transported by ambulance to Children's Hospital, one with leg injuries and the other with cuts and abrasions.

No information was available on their conditions.

Caton was taken by ambulance to Jefferson Regional Medical Center in Pleasant Hills. The hospital would not release any information on his condition.

Caton told police he blacked out and after being alerted by one of the children in his van, he awoke to find his vehicle traveling in the oncoming lane, striking Todd's vehicle head-on.

Staff writer Jeremy Sellew contributed.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.