ShareThis Page

False fire, burglar alarms can result in penalties

Mary Pickels
| Sunday, Feb. 19, 2012

Some municipalities frustrated by excessive false fire and burglar alarms report a marked decline in such alarms after enacting ordinances that can lead to fines.

Maintaining false alarms waste time and manpower, area state police also are reinforcing a more than 10-year-old law that targets repeat offenders.

In the last year, state police have cited businesses in Salem and Hempfield in Westmoreland County and in South Union, Stewart and German in Fayette County for violating the section of the state Crimes Code addressing the control of alarm devices.

False alarms in the Greensburg state police coverage area have numbered as high as 500 in a three-month period, said Trooper Steve Limani, public information officer for the barracks.

A fourth false alarm activation in a consecutive 12-month period is a summary offense carrying a maximum fine of $300.

When Stewart tourist attraction Kentuck Knob was cited for a fourth consecutive false alarm in 2010, District Judge Wendy Dennis accepted a guilty plea and levied a $197 fine.

In July, Wayne Homes of Salem paid a $231 fee imposed by District Judge Elise Glenn for an offense.

"When we go to an alarm, we categorize it as a 'fault' or 'no fault,'" Limani said.

Catastrophic weather conditions, power outages or an obvious burglary attempt can result in a "no fault" characterization of an alarm, he said.

In effect since 1998, the law has been enforced more in recent years, Limani said.

"You would be surprised at how many people either do not check with their (security) companies or their companies do not notify them unless there was an actual break-in," Limani said. "Many state resources are used if you take into consideration time driving, checking the establishment, filling out the report, and the added miles and wear and tear on the vehicle. So it is important for individuals that decide to utilize alarms that they keep them in good working order, and have their companies notify them as to the result of any alarm notification.

"And of course, when we are handling the alarm call, that eats into our proactive police time such as looking for DUI drivers, searching for drugs, etc.," Limani said.

In 1992, Pittsburgh City Council mandated residential and commercial burglary and fire alarm system owners obtain annual permits from the Department of Public Safety, with prices ranging from $25 to $100.

According to the Department of Finance's website, residential false alarms can result in fines of $15 (burglary) or $50 (fire). Commercial false alarm fines are $50 (burglar) and $350 (fire).

Permit holders are entitled to four free false alarms per year before fines are applied.

In Penn Township, a 1998 ordinance states that four to 10 false alarms in one year will result in a $50 fine per alarm. For 11 or more, it's $100 per alarm. The ordinance excludes "no fault" alarms.

A "consistent number" of false alarms -- business and residential -- led to the ordinance's creation, township Manager Bruce Light said.

"It's nowhere near, perceptionwise, as bad as it used to be," police Chief John Otto said. "The ordinance is definitely an incentive to get the alarm serviced if they keep having false alarms. In the past, it didn't matter. There was no reason to get an alarm fixed. Now they will call the alarm company and say, 'Fix it.' "

Department administrators could not recall the last time a violator was cited.

Armstrong County's Leechburg Council adopted an ordinance in 2009 fining property owners $300 on the third false fire alarm within a year.

Some businesses' alarms malfunctioned multiple times a month, said Tom Foster, a borough councilman and chief of Leechburg Volunteer Fire Company.

The ordinance is written so that the property owner is cited.

"It is up to them to go after the alarm company (for compensation)," he said.

"Funny thing is, since we enacted the ordinance we have not had to cite anyone," Foster said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.