Woman struck by car on Tarentum Bridge airlifted to hospital
By Brian C. Rittmeyer
Published: Saturday, Feb. 18, 2012,
The busy Tarentum Bridge lanes into New Kensington were closed for hours Friday night after a pedestrian was struck by a car shortly after 9 p.m.
According to police, the pedestrian, a woman whose identity was not available, was walking in one of the traffic lanes leading from Tarentum into New Kensington when she was struck.
There is no pedestrian sidewalk on that side of the bridge. New Kensington Police officer Dino DiGiacobbe said motorists reported that she was walking near the concrete median barrier in the middle of the bridge.
The extent of the woman's injuries were not known. DiGiacobbe said she was conscious when ambulance crews arrived and was able to talk with them.
She was flown by emergency helicopter to a Pittsburgh hospital.
DiGiacobbe said the initial investigation indicated that the motorist was not at fault in the accident and likely would not face charges.
The incident, however, snarled traffic both on the Tarentum Bridge and downriver at the New Kensington Bridge, which was clogged with motorists detoured there from the accident scene.
The New Kensington-bound lanes remained closed for more than two hours as accident reconstruction personnel investigated the accident.
DiGiacobbe said the accident was the second time yesterday that police responded to a report of someone walking in those traffic lanes.
At about 4 p.m. yesterday, police responded to reports of a man walking in the same area but he was gone by the time police arrived.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.