ShareThis Page

Ringgold falls in season finale

| Saturday, Feb. 11, 2012

Ringgold closed the season on a losing note, bowing to host McGuffey, 67-50, in a Section 5 AAA game Friday night.

The Rams (5-17, 2-10), who closed the season on a three-game losing streak, fell behind 15-5 after one quarter and never caught up.

The Highlanders (13-8, 6-6) led 27-12 at halftime and held a commanding 50-26 lead going into the fourth quarter.

DaShore Majors scored 15 points for Ringgold and teammate Nick Greaves added 13.

McGuffey, which clinched a playoff berth with the win, was led by Kyle Rose with 16 points while teammates Caleb Reihner and Mitchell Dobryznski added 15 and 14 points, respectively.

Bentworth 73, Jefferson-Morgan 53

The Bearcats (18-3, 10-0) capped a perfect unbeaten season in Class A Section 3 with the win.

Bentworth started slow, leading only 33-26 at halftime. However, the Bearcats outscored J-M 26-17 in the third quarter as Tyler Delval scored 10 of his 21 points.

Eric Schoedel also scored 21 points for Bentworth, while Gannon Mitchell-Walls had 12 points and Chris Blackburn 10.

The section title is the second in three seasons for Bentworth and the 18-3 record represents the winningest season in Coach Bob Kennedy's 10-year career.

Travis Taylor scored 19 points for J-M.

Even with the loss, the Rockets (8-13, 5-5) will still be in the WPIAL playoffs as the third-place team in the section.

Southmoreland 61, Yough 57

Yough (6-16, 2-10) went out with a loss as the Scotties (14-6, 8-4) prepped for the WPIAL Class AAA playoffs by winning the Section 3 finale.

Tom Szatkowski scored a game-high 25 points for Southmoreland, including 11 in the first half when the winners took a 12-4 lead. Szatkowski had four three-pointers in the game.

Mark McCracken added 15 for the Scotties.

Yough was led by Dom Miele with 22 points, including 17 in the second half.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.