Registry: UPMC liver transplant outcomes languish
UPMC's liver transplant program had a second consecutive period in which more patients than expected died but is taking steps to revise its operating procedures and review its reporting practices, a top surgeon said on Monday.
Out of 261 people who received a liver transplant at UPMC between July 2008 and December 2010, 42 died within a year of the surgery, according to the latest filing by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, which conducts scientific performance analysis of data about organ transplant programs at hospitals nationwide. Based on the number of UPMC surgeries and the patients' conditions, the registry said fewer than 29 people were expected to die.
Despite the lower-than-expected survival rate, the hospital has not shied away from taking difficult cases, said Dr. Christopher Hughes, UPMC's surgical director for liver transplants.
"We want Pittsburgh to be known as the place," Hughes said. "If it's a really bad situation you're in, UPMC is the place you should go. We don't want to become a program that is cherry-picking patients just to make our data look good."
The registry's report emerges after a tumultuous period last year for UPMC's transplant programs but reflects surgeries that took place more than a year ago. UPMC shut its live-donor liver and kidney transplant programs for nearly nine weeks last summer after surgeons inadvertently transplanted a kidney from a donor infected with hepatitis C and transferred the disease to the recipient.
Hughes said no one who received a liver transplant at UPMC during the past six months has died or rejected the organ, but that success will not start to be reflected in the data until a year from now.
The registry reported that survival outcomes for kidney and heart transplants at UPMC were within expected ranges.
UPMC is looking at how it reports patients' conditions because its expected outcomes have increased even as it has taken patients with more challenging cases, Hughes said.
He cited a case in which a patient who needed heart surgery and a liver transplant at the same time came to UPMC after other hospitals turned her away. The woman survived, but the unique circumstances that put her at an increased risk of death were not fully reflected in the reports that determine expected outcomes, Hughes said.
The hospital also has worked to standardize the steps it takes to evaluate patients and perform transplant surgeries, he said.
Across the Allegheny River, Allegheny General Hospital had liver and kidney transplant outcomes in the expected range while recording the state's highest one-year survival rate for adult heart transplant recipients -- 96 percent.
"We're going to keep doing exactly what we've been doing," said Dr. Ngoc Thai, director of abdominal transplants at the North Side hospital, flagship of UPMC rival West Penn Allegheny Health System.
Allegheny General has focused on rebuilding its transplant programs over the past several years, taking the number of heart transplants from low single digits -- four transplants in 2005 -- to a peak of 31 in 2010, said Dr. Stephen Bailey, surgical director of the heart transplant program. The number dipped to 20 last year.
"It's been an area of focused investment, mostly human investment," Bailey said. "Recruiting top quality physicians and coordinators in associated fields over the last five years has led to the good results recently."
Add Andrew Conte to your Google+ circles.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.