Police suspect arson in Kittanning fire
KITTANNING — A state police dog trained in accelerant detection sniffed out the source of a suspicious fire that broke out in an apartment building late Monday night.
"The dog was able to pinpoint an accelerant," said borough Fire Marshal Earl "Buzz" Kline.
Kline said the fire started on carpeting in the middle of a vacant apartment in the basement of the building and the discovery led fire officials to believe it may be arson.
The state police fire marshal from Butler and two state police arson investigators from New Castle, one of them part of a K-9 unit, were brought in overnight to investigate.
Samples were sent to the state crime lab to determine the type of accelerant used and possible source of ignition.
"It's a very sophisticated process that will take a week or more," Kline said.
Kittanning police are handling the investigation.
Kittanning Hose Companies 1, 4 and 6 and Rayburn Fire Department responded at 10:36 p.m. to the report of smoke filling a four-story building at 363 Arch St. at the intersection with North Grant Avenue.
About eight to 10 families were safely evacuated from their apartments and were able to go back in several hours later. There were no reports of injuries.
Kline said fire damage was contained to the one basement apartment. The rest of the building had minor smoke damage throughout, he said.
There was no structural damage to the building although firefighters did break down two doors and break some windows to gain access upon arriving.
"It could have been worse. Our guys did a fantastic job of isolating the fire and quickly taking care of the situation," Kline said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.