2 suspects arrested in Homestead drug raid
By Stacy Lee
Published: Tuesday, April 17, 2012,
Homestead police seized large amounts of marijuana, growing chemicals, equipment, cash and a firearm while executing a search warrant at a duplex along E. Eighth Avenue on Monday night for what they said was a major marijuana growing operation.
"Officers over the last couple of days had detected an odor of marijuana in the area," Homestead police Chief Jeff DeSimone said. "That coupled with some complaints that came in; they looked around."
The chief said officers detected an "overwhelming odor of marijuana" at the duplex when one of the occupants opened the door to officers Monday, then immediately slammed it shut.
"They detained that person," DeSimone said. "They could hear somebody else was upstairs. They called for him to come out, but he refused. He finally did come out after awhile."
Police obtained a search warrant for the second floor of the duplex at 328 E. Eighth Ave.
DeSimone said that, at this early stage of the investigation he can't estimate how much marijuana was in the duplex.
"It looks like it's in various forms," he said. "It looks like it's ready to be distributed or ready to be sold."
Two Pittsburgh men, ages 26 and 31, are in custody.
Charges are pending against both.
"Certainly, for us, this is a large operation," DeSimone said. "They had a pretty sophisticated setup."
He said both of the suspects' vehicles will be seized.
The police chief said the suspects had vents aerating the duplex's second floor.
"That's where the marijuana smell was emanating from," he said.
"I have a good police department," Homestead Mayor Betty Esper said. "They're always on the alert, looking for stuff. This was a big bust for us."
"They did an excellent job," DeSimone said of his officers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.