South Fayette staff recommends Children's Hospital proposal for old theater property
UPMC Children's Hospital may have bid less than a developer for 2.6 acres of township-owned land in South Fayette, but the hospital's proposal for an outpatient care center and physicians' offices would bring in more taxes and fees than a shopping center, township staff said last night.
UPMC bid $1.65 million for part of the former Star City theater property, compared to the $1.68 million proposal by Langholz Wilson Ellis subsidiary 1772 Inc. But interim Township Manager Marshall Bond said the outpatient center would likely generate about $30,000 more in taxes and fees over its first five years.
Although UPMC is nonprofit, its bid guaranteed that at least 50 percent of the development would be taxable. With an estimated $18.5 million worth of development, even half of the Children's Hospital proposal would be worth more in taxes than 1772's $7.15 million proposal, Bond said.
After factoring in issues such as the likely changes in earned income taxes, local services taxes, sales taxes and building permit fees, the UPMC proposal came out ahead despite being the lower bidder, Bond said.
Children's wants to relocate its Bethel Park offices to larger quarters in South Fayette.
His analysis didn't account for an additional $100,000 in UPMC's bid to be donated for South Fayette's proposed $7 million conversion of the movie theater into a recreation, community and government center. The township cannot guarantee it would move forward on the project within the deadline in UPMC's bid.
Barring any major questions or concerns, the township commissioners will vote on accepting one of the bids on Wednesday.
Add Matthew Santoni to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.