Bailey takes over Teamsters 205
By Patrick Cloonan
Published: Wednesday, Jan. 4, 2012,
One of the area's largest labor union locals has a new chief executive officer.
Carl A. Bailey took office this week as secretary-treasurer of White Oak-based Teamsters Local 205, succeeding the retiring Bill Lickert Jr.
"In August, Bill surprised everyone when he decided to retire," Bailey said Tuesday. "Shortly thereafter, he said he wanted to support me."
Bailey, a business agent for the local for the past 10 years, assumes the principal office in a local with more than 3,000 members in seven counties.
He pledged to carry on a tradition established by Lickert and previously by the late Bill Lickert Sr.
"We're going to try to continue to grow and be the best union we can be," Bailey said, "and try to represent our members better than anyone else on the planet."
It's the first time in decades that the local will be led by someone other than a Lickert. William E. Lickert Sr., who passed away April 2 at age 90, was president of Local 205 for 36 years, retiring on Jan. 27, 2003.
William E. Lickert Jr. retained the title of secretary-treasurer after his father's retirement but had been the local's CEO ever since.
"I'm not family," Bailey said. "I was no way related whatsoever. I was surprised and kind of honored by it, too."
Bailey was elected as part of a slate that also includes new president John Winters, re-elected vice president Karan Rymarowicz, recording secretary Edward Boehme and trustees Glenn Johnston, Glenn Lynn and Dallas Nelson.
That slate was nominated without opposition Sept. 13 for terms that started officially on Sunday.
Bailey said no "earth-shattering" changes would happen.
Among the changes is the elevation of Boehme from a trusteeship. Along with Bailey he will be a full-time presence at the White Oak office.
"The recording secretary used to be a part-time position, but we hired Ed to be a full-time business agent," Bailey said.
In much of the Mon-Yough region Local 205 is a bargaining agent for municipal employees. In the city of McKeesport, for instance, the local represents four bargaining units including the police and public works employees.
In September, Allegheny County floated a proposal to reduce the number of 911 dispatch channels to enhance efficiency and coordination of mutual aid.
Bailey told Trib Total Media news exchange partner WPXI-11 that the change would have the opposite effect.
"We think it's going to be a severe officer safety issue," Bailey said. "Every officer I've talked to, the main concern is that issue."
Bailey is a retired McKeesport police officer and brother of state 45th District Sen. James R. Brewster, a former McKeesport mayor.
On Nov. 18, Bailey went with other Mon-Yough residents to petition the Legislative Reapportionment Commission not to move the 45th District to Monroe County.
He may have won one point despite a futile bid to change the LRC's decision.
Bailey pointed out that the plan originally approved for state Senate districts split up the Mon-Yough cities of McKeesport, Duquesne and Clairton. The final plan approved Dec. 12 kept those cities together in the 46th District covering the Mon-Yough area as well as much of Washington County.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.