Cross-dressing Uniontown man chained himself inside car, police say
By Liz Zemba
Published: Tuesday, Jan. 3, 2012
A Fayette County man who police said donned women's makeup and high heels before chaining himself inside a vehicle outside a Uniontown drugstore on New Year's Day was cited for disorderly conduct.
Stephen M. Carr, 28, of 61 E. Highland Ave., Uniontown, was cited by city police after someone called Fayette 911 at 11:21 p.m. on Sunday to report seeing a male handcuffed inside a car parked outside Walgreen's on West Main Street.
Officers found Carr, dressed as a woman and with a locked chain around his neck, seated in a four-door car.
"Carr was cross-dressing by wearing makeup, female eyeglasses, a female shirt, female pants, stockings and high heels," said police in a report. The chain around Carr's neck, according to the report, was secured with a lock and led behind the driver's seat, where it was attached to Carr's ankles with handcuffs.
Carr told officers he chained himself inside his vehicle.
"He stated 'cause he came to Walgreens to get his wife a drink, and being dressed like a woman is hard to just walk into the store," police said in the report. "So he chained up/restrained himself to build himself up to going into the store dressed like a woman to get his wife a drink."
Police said Carr was cited for disorderly conduct "for causing a public alarm and annoyance by parking his vehicle near the entrance of Walgreens and chaining/restraining himself like he did."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.