Busy morning with crashes on Bullskin roads
By Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Published: Sunday, Dec. 25, 2011,
Pennsylvania State police blamed a teenager driving unsafely during wintry conditions for a midnight car crash in Bullskin Township, Fayette County.
According to a report filed by Trooper Brett J. Massafra, Ethan E. Keedy, 18, was traveling west on Spruce Hollow Road when his Pontiac Grand Am left the roadway and collided with a guiderail. The impact whipped him back onto the highway and his car came to "an uncontrolled rest" facing opposing traffic, according to the report.
Medics transported Keedy to Frick Hospital where he was treated for minor injuries and released. Police charged him with driving too fast for conditions, according to the report.
In another accident in the area, two people were taken to area hospitals after a crash later in the morning in Fayette County.
Bentley D. Keller, 24, of Connellsville was taken to UPMC Presbyterian with serious injuries after the accident in Bullskin Township at 5:45 a.m., according to state police at Uniontown. He was listed in critical condition there last night, according to a nursing supervisor.
Jeremy L. Eutsey, 24, of Scottdale was taken to Excela Health Frick Hospital for treatment of minor injuries, police said. Information on Eutsey's condition was unavailable.
Police said the men were traveling south on Route 982 in a 2003 GMC Envoy when the vehicle swerved near Nicholson Lane and struck a guide rail and a fire hydrant. The vehicle rolled several times before coming to rest on the grounds of Pleasant Valley Country Club, police said.
It was not clear from the police report who was driving the vehicle. Police said two passengers who were in the vehicle, Richard A. Swank Jr., 25, and John C. Janssen Jr., 22, both of Mt. Pleasant, were not injured.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.