New Kensington woman accused of theft from pet hospital
By Pittsburgh The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Dec. 23, 2011
A New Kensington woman stole hundreds of thousands of dollars from a Monroeville pet hospital, according to charges filed this week.
The Allegheny County District Attorney's Office charged Jennifer Schneiders, 34, with multiple theft counts and receiving stolen property. Schneider turned herself in Thursday and was released on her own recognizance. She has a preliminary hearing scheduled for Jan. 24.
Schneiders worked as a bookkeeper for AVETS, a 24-hour pet hospital on Northern Pike, according to a criminal complaint filed against her.
AVETS fired her in September after learning she edited her timecard to receive additional pay, the complaint said.
Upon further review of the books, the hospital director and an auditor discovered cash was missing from bank deposits and that Schneiders used several methods to conceal thefts over about a 26-month period before she was fired, the complaint said.
Detectives determined that about $398,000 earmarked for deposit into an AVETS' bank account was not deposited, the complaint said.
Investigators also found that the hospital director did not authorize the deposit of a company check for about $8,700 into Schneiders' account, the complaint said.
Schneiders and her attorney did not return calls for comment.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.