Pittsburgh Bishop Zubik 'shocked' at priest charges
Local Catholic church officials had no prior knowledge of criminal conduct or "problematic behavior" by a Churchill priest arraigned last week on child pornography charges, Pittsburgh Bishop David A. Zubik said this weekend in messages to parishioners.
In a phone interview on Sunday night, Zubik said he has found no information that anyone in church leadership knew of any issues with the suspect, the Rev. Bartley Sorensen. The leader of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh said he is trying to confront rumors about what church officials knew and when. Zubik wrote a letter to be read at all services this weekend and personally visited two local churches where Sorensen had worked.
"The assumption was: 'How could I not know?' I wanted to make that clear: I was just as shocked as everybody else was," said Zubik, who attended seminary with Sorensen 43 years ago.
Sorensen, 62, of St. John Fisher Church in Churchill faces a preliminary hearing scheduled for Tuesday on charges of sexual abuse of children for possession of child pornography. He remains in Allegheny County Jail on $100,000 bail.
After a church staff member caught Sorensen viewing pornographic images of young boys in his church office, investigators found more than 6,000 images and videos in the office and his bedroom, according to court documents. Sorensen has spent 35 years as a priest, but there have been no known allegations against him nor is there any record of concerned reports about his behavior, Zubik told parishioners in the 518-word letter. He encouraged people who may have allegations against Sorensen to contact church and state hotlines for victims.
Sorensen is on administrative leave, receiving a small stipend from the church, Zubik said. He had taken a personal leave from 2003 to 2004, but a church spokesman has said that was because of a family health problem.
Before moving in November to fill a priest vacancy at St. John Fisher, Sorensen had worked as a chaplain at St. Anne's Parish in Castle Shannon, according to the diocese. Zubik visited St. Anne's on Saturday and St. John Fisher yesterday, reading the letter and taking questions from parishioners at both.
"A lot of the people as they were coming out of the church ... said it's hard for them to believe (the charges) because he was such a kind and compassionate priest," Zubik said. "That was my shock, too, that he would be involved in this type of behavior, because his outward demeanor was so completely different."
The bishop said he has been in contact with experts who said the "nature of addiction" might have prevented Sorensen from seeing "how repulsive" child pornography is.
The diocese has reappointed the Rev. Carl Gentile as pastor at St. John Fisher, delaying his plans to retire, Zubik said.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.