Gateway high school girl raped by classmates, police say
By Adam Brandolph
Published: Saturday, Dec. 3, 2011,
Monroeville police charged two Gateway Senior High School students with raping a 14-year-old female classmate in the laundry room of a nearby apartment building during school hours.
Natale J. Kirkland, 18, of Monroeville and a male juvenile were charged with rape, aggravated indecent assault, false imprisonment and related charges.
It is unclear whether they have attorneys. Their families could not be reached for comment.
The girl, Kirkland and the male juvenile left school on Tuesday and walked to Cambridge Square Apartments where they smoked marijuana in a laundry room, according to a criminal complaint filed against Kirkland.
Police said each male raped the girl. She told school officials what happened on the following day.
Police found condom wrappers in a trash can, according to the complaint. Investigators found signs of assault during an exam at A Child's Place at Mercy.
Gateway School District spokeswoman Cara Zanella said the district contacted police as soon as officials learned of the rape.
"We helped police as much as we could," Zanella said.
Kirkland was being held in the Allegheny County Jail on $75,000 bail. He is scheduled for a preliminary hearing on Dec. 13. The juvenile was being held in Shuman Juvenile Detention Center in Lincoln-Lemington.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.