Local men serve in official capacity
By George Guido
Published: Sunday, Nov. 27, 2011
Besides Knoch's appearance at Heinz Field on Saturday, there was some other local flavor at the stadium.
Three local men were part of the various officiating crews.
Tarentum's Chas Simoni Jr. worked the Class A game between Clairton and Sto-Rox.
West Deer's Joe Catanese worked the Knoch game, while Plum's Nick Morea was on the crew in the Class AA game when Jeannette played Aliquippa.
Simoni and Morea are part of a rare breed to have both played in and officiated in WPIAL playoff games.
Highlands was in the postseason with Simoni at quarterback and Morea played for Kiski Area in 1975 when the Cavaliers played in the first overtime game in WPIAL history against North Allegheny at Valley High School.
New Kensington's Frank Campbell played for Valley's 1981 playoff team and has officiated previous WPIAL championship games.
Piling up points
Knoch's third-quarter touchdown enabled the Knights to set the all-time Alle-Kiski Valley team scoring record, surpassing Ford City's 467 scored in 2006.
Knoch finished the season with 476 points, an average of 36.6 points per game.
Apollo's 1927 team, however, still holds the local mark for scoring average in a season. The A-K's pioneer football school averaged 39.2 per game, augmented by a 131-0 lambasting of Plumville.
Can't beat Montour
Yesterday was the third time the Spartans defeated an A-K team in the finals.
The Spartans knocked off Arnold in 1964 and Freeport the previous year.
Montour also beat Knoch in the 2007 semifinals, Highlands in '96 and Valley in '93, both first-round games.
Knoch handed a loss to Montour in the 1992 semifinals, and Valley beat the Spartans in the '98 opening round.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.