Three teens killed in Armstrong County wreck
A crash on Friday night in Armstrong County killed three Punxsutawney teens and left one in critical condition.
Punxsutawney High School assistant principal Darren Hack called the deaths of Sean David McConnaughey, 18, Joel Riggleman, 18, and Dylan Behrendt, 19, "very shocking."
The teens were 2011 graduates of the high school.
A fourth person in the vehicle, Blair Smith, 19, of Punxsutawney, was taken to Allegheny General Hospital, North Side, where he was in critical condition, state police said.
The crash occurred about 10:30 p.m. on Route 839 in Wayne Township.
State police at Kittanning said McConnaughey's vehicle went off the road and rolled over several times. All four occupants were ejected.
State police said they are trying to determine why McConnaughey's vehicle went off the road, as well as where the four were seated at the time of the crash.
McConnaughey suffered head injuries, according to Deputy Coroner Robert Bellas.
A spokesman for the Allegheny County Medical Examiner's Office said autopsy results for Behrendt and Riggleman were incomplete.
Funeral arrangements for Behrendt and McConnaughey are being handled by McCabe Funeral Home in Punxsutawney, a spokeswoman at the funeral home said.
Hack said grief counselors will be on hand for students at the high school when classes resume.
"They were nice young men," Hack said of the three friends. "I'm really saddened."
A faculty member, Alan Nichol, called the deaths "tragic."
Nichol and several other teachers refused to say more out of respect for the families.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.