Monessen woman arrested in Donora on drug charges
DONORA - A Monessen woman was arrested in Donora Tuesday night for allegedly having drugs and two guns - including an assault rifle - in her vehicle.
Jodie Lynn Hans, 18, of 140 Fairfield Drive, was charged by Donora police with receiving stolen property, possession of a controlled substance (suspected crack cocaine), possession of drug paraphernalia, unsworn falsification to authorities and hindering apprehension or prosecution.
Hans was traveling in the 100 block of Castner Avenue at 6:29 p.m. when police said she failed to make a complete stop at a stop sign, accord-ing to the affidavit of probable cause.
When police asked Hans to get out of the vehicle, a passenger, Michael Chaney, stepped out of the vehicle. When police asked him where he was going, he saw a small bag of suspected crack cocaine sitting near the passenger seat where Chaney was allegedly sitting.
Another passenger, Tony Dungee, was also removed from the vehicle, according to the affidavit.
During the search of the vehicle, a pistol was found under the driver's seat. Police said a SKS assault rifle was also found in the vehicle and a straw, white powder residue and a pistol magazine were allegedly found in Hans purse.
Police said the pistol had been reported stolen. The assault rifle was not registered to anyone in the vehicle, police said.
Hans was arraigned and remanded to the Washington County Correctional Facility in lieu of $125,000 bond.
She faces a hearing at 10:30 a.m. Nov. 17 before Magisterial District Judge Mark Wilson.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.