Former supervisor tops vote-getters in West Deer
An incumbent, a former supervisor and two newcomers were the lead vote-getters in a closely contested race for West Deer supervisor.
Former Supervisor Richard DiSanti, a Democrat, won a third term in office and the most votes in the race at 1,132, according to unofficial election results late Tuesday. Incumbent Tracy Alan Adamik, also a Democrat, came in second with 1,042 votes.
Republican newcomers Gerry Vaerewyck, who unsuccessfully ran against state Rep. Frank Dermody last year, and Lawrence McManus rounded out the winners' bracket with 1,038 and 957 votes, respectively.
The remaining four candidates who did not win a seat on the board were: Republicans Bronco Brnardic with 932 votes and Richard Bossart Jr. at 924; and Democrats Michael Sutter, 898, and James Smullin, 823.
The majority of candidates said improving township roads were among their top priorities.
Here are the results of some of the other main supervisor races in the Alle-Kiski Valley, according to unofficial results:
Republican challenger John Rennick "Ren" Steele unseated incumbent Supervisor Doug Custer, a Democrat.
Steele, a retired teacher and co-director of the township-based Freeport Theatre Festival, received 688 votes compared to Custer's 412 votes.
Steele said he will focus on encouraging responsible growth and improving infrastructure in Allegheny Township.
Both political newcomer Matthew Sweeny and incumbent Gregory Furer will be supervisors next year.
Sweeny, a Republican who works in sales, was the lead vote-getter with 702 votes. Furer, also a Republican who has served one term in office, came in second with 557 votes.
Charles Garia, the lone Democrat on the ballot, trailed with 512 votes.
Incumbent Supervisor James Halstead will serve a fourth term in office.
Halstead, a Republican, received 420 votes compared to the 291 earned by challenger Art Biernesser, a Republican who appeared on the Democratic ballot.
Between his 12 years in office and his position as township roadmaster, Halstead touted his political and community experience as benefits to the community.
Newcomer Allen Uhler unseated incumbent Thomas Baker for township supervisor.
Uhler, a Democrat, gathered 280 votes compared to 217 earned by Baker, a Republican who has served one term in office.
Upper Burrell's oversight of Marcellus shale natural gas drilling was a key issue. Uhler said he'd like the township to have stronger regulations in place.
Incumbent Richard Gardner easily reclaimed a third term as supervisor.
At 703 votes, the two-term Republican earned double the number of votes received by his Democrat challenger, Fred Schiffer, who had 348 votes.
Gardner was challenged during the primary election by several candidates who opposed the township's sewerage expansion work, but Schiffer said he supported those projects.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.