Keep Sunday hunting restrictions
Pennsylvania hunters already spend more "days afield" than those of any other state ... 103 days to hunt deer, including 18 Saturdays.
Farmers across the commonwealth and a mounting number of other Pennsylvanians have been sending a clear message to the state General Assembly: "Don't expand Sunday hunting."
Most farmers feel strongly about it. We want a day of peace and quiet on Sunday, when we may work less and enjoy more time with our family and friends around the farm. Posting "No Sunday Hunting" on our lands won't prevent the intrusions. Hunters frequently cross property lines and, while responsible hunters respect private land, owners know that trespass and poor enforcement is a serious problem that would become worse.
This is not only about farmers and hunters. More than 12 million other Pennsylvanians, including those living in cities and the suburbs, should be involved in the discussion and decision. Many take to the state's outdoors to hike, bike, ride horses or just enjoy a family picnic. Now, they aren't concerned by gunfire on Sundays and don't feel a need to wear blaze orange outfits like hunters. If the current law changes, so will Sundays in Pennsylvania.
Legislation before the General Assembly in Harrisburg would not only repeal current restrictions on Sunday hunting, but also turn future decision-making about it over to the Pennsylvania Game Commission. The Game Commission's job is to manage wildlife populations, not to deal with potential conflicts between segments of state residents.
Some Sunday hunting advocates argue that it is not fair for them to be prevented from hunting on their own land, implying that everyone has the right to do whatever he wishes, whenever he wants, on his own property. There are already many restrictions or limitations on private property established for the greater good. Many believe some of those restrictions are unwarranted or excessive. Most farmers just don't happen to feel that limits on Sunday hunting are among them.
Proponents of a change in the law claim Pennsylvania's economy will get a boost from Sunday hunting, citing a study commissioned by a General Assembly committee. The Pennsylvania Farm Bureau and many others, however, believe the statistics are greatly exaggerated and fail to account for other considerations. For example, how much revenue and how many jobs will be lost if fewer Pennsylvanians -- and out-of-state visitors -- participate in recreational activities other than hunting on Sundays• The study assumes that resident hunters won't contribute to the state's economy on Sunday if they are not hunting.
According to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Pennsylvania hunters already spend more "days afield" than those of any other state. There are 103 days to hunt deer, including 18 Saturdays. Meanwhile, the Game Commission already has the authority to expand deer-hunting opportunities by adding two more days to the rifled deer season and/or by allowing hunting on the Friday and Saturday following Thanksgiving, or other measures.
The bottom line: Current law restricting Sunday hunting provides a reasonable balance for farmers, hunters and the millions of other people who enjoy the outdoors of Pennsylvania.
Carl T. Shaffer, a full-time farmer in Columbia County, is president of the Pennsylvania Farm Bureau.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Steelers notebook: Chiefs pass rush to test Steelers
- Developer reveals Buncher plans for 400 Strip District apartments, townhomes
- Navy developing robotic fish drone
- Starkey: Pederson had to go at Pitt
- Steelers, young and old, thirst for opportunity to reach the postseason
- Penguins’ Crosby details his mumps experience
- Stock market makes biggest gain in 3 years
- Smoking, drinking falls off among teens, but not drug use
- Steelers notebook: Brown leads WRs in Pro Bowl voting, Bell 2nd at RB
- QB Smith is chief concern for Steelers’ defense
- Demolition project at Oliver’s Pourhouse in Greensburg moves ahead