Family court needs to change
In child custody cases, judges should speak with each parent. When a judge speaks only with the child, does the judge truly have insight into whether the child is being brainwashed?
Each case in family court differs and each needs to be reviewed more closely for the sake of the children. Judges should require parents to bring proof to back up the statements they make in court.
Too many children are falling into the hands of the wrong parent. Then the courts question why some parents take their children and run.
My prayer is that the system changes for the sake of all children.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Penguins forwards struggle in loss to Avalanche
- Starkey: In defense of Mel Kiper Jr.
- Agent: Polamalu undecided whether to play in 2015
- Upgrades anticipated for Port Vue police equipment
- Seuss stories inspire ‘math in a hat’
- Mt. Lebanon deer-culling corrals sprayed with urine, repellant
- Angry fans cited in shortage of refs in Western Pennsylvania
- Pirates look to put more pressure on opposition with better baserunning
- Ice jam wipes out McKeesport’s marina
- West Mifflin dog blamed in toddler’s death set to be euthanized
- 11 Ligonier Township residents rescued by boat from floodwaters