Man arrested after driving stolen car into home
By Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Published: Tuesday, Oct. 25, 2011,
Pittsburgh police arrested a man accused of a carjacking and kidnapping in Bloomfield last night.
Police charged Jamal Griffin, 36, no address available, with robbery of a motor vehicle, kidnapping, reckless endangerment and other crimes.
Police were called to the Exxon gas station on Penn Avenue about 8:50 p.m. for a report of an armed robbery. Witnesses said Griffin arrived at the gas station with two other people in a green Buick and began staring at the victim and his friend, who were putting air in the tires of a Chevrolet Impala, according to a complaint filed against Griffin.
Holding a gun, Griffin ran toward the victim, pushed him into the passenger side of the Impala and took off south on 40th Street, the complaint said.
An officer spotted the Impala on Aisbett Street, but Griffin fled in reverse, struck a parked car and then almost hit the officer's car as he sped forward, the complaint said. The victim was able to jump out of the vehicle shortly after. He refused to go to the hospital.
Griffin crashed into a home on Broad Street and tried to flee on foot, but officers took him into custody in a lot behind North Mathilda Street, the complaint said.
Police found drugs and the victim's wallet on Griffin, and a black pistol about two feet away from him, the complaint said.
Griffin began to have a seizure and medics took him to UPMC Presbyterian hospital in stable condition.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.