Pittsburgh on National Geographic's 'Best of the World 2012' list
If you can't swing a trip to the tea plantations of Sri Lanka, the tropical beaches of Koh Lipe, Thailand, or the hot springs of Iceland, consider Pittsburgh.
In its November issue, National Geographic Traveler names the Steel City among the 20 places to experience in its "Best of the World 2012."
Pittsburgh gets its due in an entry titled "Extreme Metropolitan Makeover."
According to National Geographic Traveler: "Its mourning for its industrial past long concluded, this Western Pennsylvania city changed jobs and reclaimed its major assets: a natural setting that rivals Lisbon and San Francisco, a wealth of fine art and architecture and a quirky sense of humor."
The author also notes that director Christopher Nolan was sufficiently impressed by "Pittsburgh's century-wide swath of architectural styles" to use Pittsburgh as a stand-in for Gotham in "The Dark Knight Rises," which shot here earlier this year.
Craig Davis, vice president of sales and marketing for VisitPittsburgh, says he couldn't have said it better himself. "To be placed in that kind of company, being the only U.S. city to make that list, was really a wonderful thing for us. It really does go to prove that Pittsburgh is just a great place to visit. It's obviously best when somebody else says it rather than us."
The Sonoma, Calif., region was the only other U.S. destination listed. Other destinations include Peru, Oman and Mongolia.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.