Vandergrift police nab Gilpin man wanted in Wisconsin
A Gilpin man on the run from authorities in Wisconsin was arrested on Monday in Vandergrift.
According to Vandergrift police, James Schantz, 54, was apprehended at Route 56 and Pennsylvania Avenue, on suspicion of drunken driving.
Upon the arrest, Vandergrift police discovered that Schantz, who is living at 114 Sober Lane, Gilpin, had a warrant issued for his arrest in Chippewa County, Wis.
According to the Chippewa Sheriff's office, Schantz is wanted by the county on charges of substantial domestic battery from an incident that allegedly occurred in June.
Schantz had a valid Pennsylvania driver's license and was driving a Pontiac Grand Am with Wisconsin license plates at the time of his arrest, according to Vandergrift police.
Along with drunken driving, Schantz is charged with being a fugitive.
Schantz is in the Westmoreland County jail awaiting extradition to Wisconsin.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.