ShareThis Page

Kiski Area no match for NA

| Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011

Kiski Area struggled to its 10th straight loss Friday night by falling, 63-17, to defending PIAA Class AAAA champion North Allegheny in a nonconference game at Davis Field in Vandergrift.

Senior running back Owen Copney rushed for 192 yards and both touchdowns on 17 carries for the Cavaliers (0-6, 0-3).

"My line made some good blocks for me tonight," Copney said. "I think we caught them off-guard, too. We had some players starting tonight who don't normally start. We just kept fighting."

The Cavaliers' defense has been plagued by big plays all year, and the trend continued: They gave up scoring plays of 68, 77 and 24 yards.

"They came in and did their thing — they are North Allegheny," Kiski Area coach Troy Wilson said. "We could not afford to make mistakes."

Kiski Area was overwhelmed by the Tigers (6-0, 3-0) early. Running back Isiah Thomas scored on the opening drive, reaching the end zone on a 7-yard run just 1:23 in.

After the Cavaliers turned the ball over on the kick return, the Tigers found the end zone again. Quarterback Mack Leftwich found receiver James Kleinhampl for a 24-yard connection to make it 14-0.

North Allegheny made it 28-0 before Copney scored on a 58-yard run that showcased his quickness. With 2:32 left in the first half and North Allegheny leading, 42-7, sophomore Adam Mitcheson booted a 45-yard field goal to make it 42-10. Copney scored on a 15-yard to make it 49-17.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.