Burgettstown man faces child sex charges
A former West Brownsville man accused of raping a 7-year-old girl has been jailed.
West Brownsville police charged Caleb Kenion "Teo" Ramey, 29, of 221 Center St., Burgettstown, for the alleged sexual assaults of the girl at a home on Main Street.
Police said that on Aug. 31, the girl told a social worker at UPMC-Mercy Hospital in Pittsburgh about the alleged assaults, according to an affidavit of probable cause filed with Magisterial District Judge Joshua Kanalis, in Centerville.
The child told the social worker Ramey took her from her bed and into a bathroom, where he taped her mouth shut and bound her wrists and feet with Duct tape. He allegedly taped her hands to the toilet, according to the affidavit.
The child said Ramey told her that if she screamed or told anyone, she would be "whipped with a belt," according to the affidavit.
Police said the girl told the social worker she had to refer to Ramey as "Teo" or be beaten with a belt.
Ramey is charged with rape of a child, indeviate sexual intercourse, aggravated indecent assault, indecent assault of a child less than 13, endangering the welfare of a child, indecent exposure, recklessly endangering another person, kidnap to inflict injury/terror, unlawful restraint, false imprisonment and terroristic threats.
Ramey was placed in the Washington County Correctional Facility in lieu of $500,000 bond.
He faces a preliminary hearing 10 a.m. Wednesday in Washington County Central Court.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.