ShareThis Page

Penn-Trafford gets win over Hempfield

| Saturday, Sept. 17, 2011

Zach Emerick passed for 256 yards and accounted for four touchdowns to lead the high-powered offense of Penn-Trafford (3-0, 1-0) to a 45-14 victory over Hempfield (0-3, 0-1) on Friday.

Running back Manny Simpson has garnered most of the attention for Penn-Trafford this season, but the Warriors showed their offense is not one-dimensional against the Spartans. Emerick tossed two touchdown passes within the first three minutes of the contest, giving the Warriors a lead they never surrendered. Emerick found Dylan Stewart on a 27-yard strike and then connected with Tyler Dudek from 28 yards 15 seconds later. Dudek's score followed a fumble recovery forced by the Penn-Trafford special teams, one of three turnovers induced by the Warriors.

After Travis Day's 11-yard touchdown run pulled Hempfield within seven points, Simpson got involved in the offense. The prolific running back, who totaled 480 yards in his first two contests, took his second carry of the game 52 yards for a touchdown. Simpson first showed his speed to get to the outside and then overpowered the last Spartans defender.

Penn-Trafford coach John Ruane believed that run epitomized Simpson's ability, saying, "That's what he does best. He got into the open field, and then won the one-on-one battle."

Simpson finished with 153 yards on 18 carries.

After a 22-yard field goal by Matt Loughnane to end the half extended the Warriors lead, Emerick once again found Dudek on a 15-yard scoring strike early in the third quarter. Emerick then capped his terrific effort by scoring on a 1-yard run to put Penn-Trafford ahead, 38-7.

"Hempfield put eight guys in the box and forced us to throw," Ruane said. "Zach (Emerick) was the difference in the game."

Quarterback DeLorian Day sparked the Hempfield offense after replacing Ty George in the second half, as Day passed for 94 yards and a touchdown on five attempts.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.