Convicted drug dealer sentenced to jail term
By Stacy Wolford
Published: Friday, Sept. 9, 2011
A Nottingham Township man, described as a major drug dealer in the Mon Valley, will be going to a state prison.
Daniel Young, 40, of 2671 Route 136, was sentenced Thursday to 12 to 24 years in jail by Washington County Judge Janet Moschetta Bell for his conviction on 38-drug related charges.
Washington County District Attorney Steven Toprani described Young as a "major player" in the Mon Valley's drug trade.
Young was convicted on June 16 by a Washington County jury on nine counts of delivery of a controlled substance (cocaine), 10 counts of possession of controlled substance, 10 counts of possession with the intent to deliver, and nine counts of criminal use of a communication facility.
Young was arrested on Jan. 18, 2010, after a targeted investigation in the Mon Valley of the cocaine trade.
When arrested outside of his mother's home in Monongahela, he possessed approximately half an ounce of cocaine packaged for sale and cash.
"Dan Young was a high level cocaine dealer who thought he could poison the community without consequence," Toprani said.
"Today's sentence demonstrates that those who believe that they can operate above the law and destroy the fabric our community will suffer the consequences."
Detectives said they believed Young had been selling drugs for the last 15 years.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.