School bus contractor picks up complaints
By Tory N. Parrish
Published: Wednesday, Sept. 7, 2011
The Penn Hills School District made a wrong turn when it hired a contractor to take over student bus transportation, some irate parents say.
Some drivers for First Student Inc., a division of Cincinnati-based FirstGroup America, have been picking up students late since the company started transporting them Aug. 31, they said.
The district hired First Student to provide bus service for 4,700 students after contract negotiations with unionized bus drivers collapsed.
A First Student spokeswoman said she would check into the complaints about bus service.
But this morning, some parents at bus stops said they are still experiencing problems, and even where they have been corrected, remain angry.
"On the first day of school, the bus never showed up. At the end of the day, my daughter was left on the school bus and taken 10 to 15 minutes down the road," said Julie Parker, who waited at a stop on Shannon Road with her children, who are in kindergarten and first grade.
"I had to call the bus company to find her," said Julie Parker, who has children in kindergarten and first grade. "There's going to be a lot of angry parents at the next PTA meeting."
Betty Johnson, at the Penn Hills Free Methodist Church on Universal Road, said her fourth grader's bus was early.
"The bus is supposed to get her at 8:25 a.m. It's 8:20 a.m. right now, and it's already gone. That happened two days in a row now.
"I have to go, because I have to get these kids to school," she said before driving away in her van.
In May, Penn Hills hired First Student to replace drivers with Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1552. The district said that hiring First Student would save it $3.3 million this year and between $1.4 million and $1.7 million in remaining years of the five-year contract.
The district laid off 75 drivers, five mechanics and 12 bus aides.
Still, bargaining talks must continue, and a Labor Relations Board hearing will take place Feb. 1 if a deal isn't reached before then, the state Department of Labor & Industry said last month.
The school district is investigating the complaints on a case-by-case basis and working with First Student to get the problems corrected as quickly as possible, Superintendent Thomas Washington said Tuesday.
"For the most part, the timing has gotten better each and every day," he said.
The scheduling glitches are a normal problem in a new school year, compounded by the First Student switch, but the late arrivals are not excessive, Washington said.
Union President Lori Krapf could not be reached for comment.
Not all parents are having problems with First Student.
"Everything has run similar to previous years. There's always a couple little hiccups the first couple days of schools," said Christine Polaski, who has two daughters in Linton Middle School. She is the president of the Linton Parent Teacher Association but she said was not speaking for the PTA.
School director Joe Bailey, one of two board members who voted against hiring First Student, said problems should have been expected.
"Realistically, I know that whenever you introduce something new into the environment, you have to allow time for things to really pan out and operate the way that you would expect," said Bailey, who is driving his 16-year-old daughter to Penn Hills Senior High School this school year.
He said administrators met with officials of First Student on Friday to discuss parents' concerns.
Patrick Varine contributed.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.