Entrepreneurial program helps former convicts to rise up
By Jason Cato
Published: Monday, Aug. 29, 2011
Vincent Bostic is on the verge of running his own company instead of running with the wrong crowd.
"I'm flying high and feel great right now," said Bostic, 37, of the Hill District, who plans this fall to open Tight 'n Right, a commercial cleaning business. "A year ago, I really didn't know where I was going to go with my life."
Today, he and seven other ex-offenders are scheduled to graduate from the Entrepreneurial Mindset Program, a partnership started last year between the Mon Valley Initiative and the Institute for Entrepreneurial Excellence at the University of Pittsburgh to help train people convicted of nonviolent crimes how to start businesses.
About 700,000 people will be released from state and federal prisons this year, according to the U.S. Bureau of Justice. Nearly seven out of 10 will be arrested again within three years, either for parole violations or new crimes, a 2006 study showed. Another study determined that nearly 90 percent of those who violate their parole terms were unemployed when they did.
"It's always difficult to address the issue of employment with people with a criminal record," said Ann Jacobs, director of the Prisoner Reentry Institute at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City. "They start with a strike against them. In today's economy, it's exponentially more difficult."
The Entrepreneurial Mindset Program is part of an emerging trend trying to help ex-offenders solve that problem by creating their own jobs.
"Some of them have business characteristics many entrepreneurs have," said C.J. Handron, a management consultant at the Pitt's institute who oversees the ex-offender program. "Drug dealers, for example, understand inventory, employees and customers. It's just being applied in the wrong way."
That's a correlation Bostic understands well, although he doesn't like to discuss it.
Allegheny County court records show a string of drug-related arrests led to several stints on probation before an 18-month jail sentence.
"I made some bad decisions when I was younger," Bostic said.
But participating in the program "was one of the greatest things I think I've done to date," he said. "Things that seemed so far-fetched to me don't seem so far-fetched anymore."
The six-month program -- funded by the Heinz Endowments -- offers 50 to 60 hours of training through a mix of educational workshops, one-on-one coaching, guest speaker events and visits to local businesses. Candidates are being considered for the next class, which begins in October.
The program has no specific goals when it comes to reducing recidivism, but Handron said organizers work hard to keep participants from returning to jail. Only one of 18 graduates has reoffended -- "a statistic we are quite pleased with, to date," he said.
Michael Thomas Goosby II, 22, said he is close to realizing a dream of having a day care center with his mother, who owned one in Penn Hills for 16 years before a fire destroyed the business.
Goosby of East Pittsburgh graduated in 2007 from Penn Hills High School, where he was a standout football player. Two years later, he was arrested on drug charges. Court records show he was ordered to spend 18 months as part of a residential program and another year on probation.
"All my past troubles are behind me," Goosby said.
While starting businesses is an admirable goal, Jacobs said that should not be the only measure of these programs. They also teach participants to be more ambitious, have better attitudes and be responsible for their decisions -- all things she said are important regardless of whether they become business owners. The programs also provide support and social capital, she said.
"Even people who've had trouble, it teaches them that they can be somebody," Goosby said. "They can have a career, own a business."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.