Penn Hills police find report of kidnapping 'strange'
By Bob Bauder
Published: Tuesday, Aug. 16, 2011
Police are investigating a report that a Penn Hills woman was kidnapped and her car stolen early Monday.
They aren't sure whether the report, which a friend of the woman phoned in around 4 a.m., is legitimate, Penn Hills Police Chief Howard Burton said.
Police can't find the woman or the friend who called.
"The whole thing is strange," Burton said, noting that Allegheny County police are now investigating.
Allegheny County police did not return repeated calls for comment yesterday.
Burton said his department received a call around 4 a.m. from a person identifying himself as a Wilkinsburg resident and friend of the 25-year-old Penn Hills woman. The man told police that she had phoned him to say she was the victim of a carjacking.
Burton said investigators learned from an ex-boyfriend of the woman that she was going to a bar at Station Square on Sunday night.
Burton would not identify any of the people involved.
Neither the woman nor her car was at her home. The car is a white Mercedes Benz with license HTA2044.
Pittsburgh police spokeswoman Diane Richard said officers from the Zone 3 station in Allentown assisted West Mifflin police in searching for suspects on Mifflin and Lebanon roads, but she could provide no further information.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.