ShareThis Page

SCI-Pittsburgh guard arrested, charged with threatening another in Robinson

Bob Bauder
| Thursday, Aug. 4, 2011

A guard suspended from his job at the Woods Run state prison was charged Wednesday with threatening and stalking another guard and his wife during a confrontation triggered by an ongoing state investigation of alleged prison staff misconduct.

Tory D. Kelly, 39, of Hopewell, Beaver County, showed up outside the Robinson home of Curtis and Michele Hoffman on Tuesday in a rage, screaming obscenities and accusing Curtis Hoffman of "talking … behind his back," according to a criminal complaint filed by a detective with the Allegheny County District Attorney's Office. Curtis Hoffman also works as a guard at SCI-Pittsburgh.

Kelly left after Michele Hoffman, who witnessed the confrontation, told him she was calling the police, the complaint said.

Kelly is in the Allegheny County Jail this morning awaiting arraignment, according to the district attorney's office.

Investigators with the state Department of Corrections Office of Special Investigations previously questioned Curtis Hoffman about the alleged staff misconduct, and Kelly was one of several guards suspended last year as a result of that probe, the complaint said.

A union representing the prison guards previously reported that a total of eight guards were suspended. The corrections department also has replaced the prison superintendent and several high-ranking officers.

Hoffman told the state investigators that another guard told him that Kelly previously threatened Hoffman's life, saying he "had a .50-caliber bullet with Hoffman's name on it," according to the complaint.

Kelly was charged with simple assault, witness retaliation, terroristic threats and stalking.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.