Former New Kensington attorney gets early release
By Rich Cholodofsky
Published: Wednesday, July 20, 2011
A former New Kensington lawyer serving time for swindling more than $280,000 from his clients was to be released from jail last night, nearly five months before he was scheduled for parole.
Westmoreland County Judge John Blahovec on Tuesday granted an early parole to Michael David Nardelli, saying the one-time lawyer is ready to re-enter society.
Nardelli, 43, pleaded guilty to 63 felony counts of theft and forgery in August. In January, Blahovec sentenced him to 11 1/2 to 23 months in jail and 10 years of probation.
Nardelli appeared in court yesterday to ask for early parole.
"In my mind, because of what happened, you needed to go to jail," Blahovec said. "What I'm most concerned about now is getting money back for these victims. You have started to take steps in the long road back."
As part of the jail's work release program, Nardelli has been employed since February as a laborer in a wood refinishing shop. During that time, he has made monthly payments of nearly $600 to the courts. Some of that money has been used to repay victims, according to defense attorney Wayne McGrew.
In 2008, Nardelli agreed to a voluntary disbarment after the thefts were disclosed.
According to court records, Nardelli began taking money from clients in 2002. Police said Nardelli took money from escrow accounts for personal use. He also pleaded guilty to forging dozens of checks from a company he represented.
"He was behind in payments, and it just snowballed," McGrew said yesterday, relaying Nardelli's explanation for the theft.
Nardelli, who worked as an attorney in his family's New Kensington law firm, told Blahovec that he had learned from his jail experience.
"I don't know how something like this doesn't change somebody," Nardelli said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.